91 West Gainsborough Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Gainsborough Oaks Costs & Pricing
Gainsborough Oaks offers competitive pricing for its room options compared to both Ventura County and the broader California state averages. For a semi-private room, residents can expect to pay $2,500 per month, which is significantly lower than the county average of $3,438 and the state average of $3,333. Private rooms at Gainsborough Oaks are priced at $3,500, again more affordable than both Ventura County's average of $4,082 and California's average of $3,939. Similarly, their studio apartments are available for $3,500 each month, which is favorable when compared to the county average of $4,021 and the state average of $4,145. Overall, Gainsborough Oaks presents an appealing value for those seeking quality accommodations in a serene environment while maintaining budgetary considerations.
| Floor plans | Gainsborough Oaks | Ventura County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $2,500 | $3,438 | $3,333 |
| Studio | $3,500 | $4,021 | $4,145 |
| Private | $3,500 | $4,082 | $3,939 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$250 / mo
Dignity Care Home 1
$2,750 to $4,150 / month22.4 miles away -
from -$300 / mo
Granada Hills Gardens
$2,200 to $3,500 / month21.7 miles away -
About the same
Familycare Cottage IV
$2,500 to $4,500 / month1.7 miles away -
About the same
Sunrise Guest Home
$2,500 to $3,000 / month9.2 miles away -
from -$100 / mo
Leisure Living
$2,400 to $3,000 / month5.3 miles away
Overall Review of Gainsborough Oaks
Pros
Maria was described as very friendly.- The room was of good size.
- The room was offered at a good price.
- A resident said they liked it a lot, and a family member agreed.
Cons
The house was a little run down.- Ceiling and wall damages were evident.
- An interior paint job was needed.
- The place was a little unkept.
- A previous property run by the same team was shut down due to an employee issue.
- The reviewer felt they needed to keep looking.
- The same team running this place as the last place their mother stayed in was horrible.
- They were already up to their ears with residents.
- Residents were reportedly being placed two to a room.
- If these people continue to run the other place the way they did, this place will be the next to close down.
Review
Gainsborough Oaks is best suited for seniors who are budget-minded and prioritizing a personal, friendly touch over showroom polish. The standout asset is a staff member named Maria, whose warmth consistently appears as a plus in conversations with prospective residents. In a setting where price and room size are workable, residents can expect a homey vibe and approachable interaction that can help ease the transition. However, a clear cost of admission accompanies this warmth: visible maintenance blemishes, uneven upkeep, and a sense that the property itself is not kept to a high standard. For someone who wants a clean, move-in ready environment, this arrangement would feel inadequate.
That said, certain families may want to look elsewhere. The strongest red flags revolve around consistency and long-term viability. Reviewers flag the same management team as a previous facility that faced serious problems, including a perception of being overwhelmed by residents and questionable placement practices. There is also a repeated concern about overcrowding, with speculation that rooms are shared in ways that compromise privacy and care planning. For loved ones who require reliable staffing, predictable routines, and transparent governance, Gainsborough Oaks likely won’t meet expectations in the long run.
The core positives, the accessible price, reasonable room dimensions, and the pleasant rapport with at least one staff member, do offer some practical value. They can translate into lower monthly costs and a straightforward, approachable daily experience. Yet these advantages are easily eclipsed by the principal drawbacks. Cosmetic neglect, ceiling and wall damage, and an overall sense of being “unkept” undermine daily living quality and can create ongoing maintenance hassles. When weight is given to safety, privacy, and dignity, the price advantage does not fully compensate for the conspicuous physical and operational shortcomings.
Management and stability concerns compound the issue. The suggestion that the same team responsible for a prior, troubled facility now operates Gainsborough Oaks introduces a pattern that prospective residents should scrutinize. Lifecare in senior housing hinges on dependable staffing, clear accountability, and the ability to scale to changing resident needs. If leadership has a documented history of closures or systemic problems, families must ask pointed questions: current occupancy levels, turnover rates, caregiver-to-resident ratios, and what concrete steps are in place to prevent a repeat of past issues. Tour remarks and written policy clarifications become essential tools in evaluating risk.
For families taking a measured step toward Gainsborough Oaks, a disciplined due diligence plan is not optional. Demand a candid tour focused on maintenance schedules, housekeeping standards, and safety features. Review the floor plans to confirm whether two residents per room are indeed in practice and, if so, the safeguards for privacy and care quality. Seek updated staffing data, including current ratios, shift coverage, and supervisor oversight. Request a formal, written summary of resident rights, service agreements, and incident escalation procedures, and compare these documents against other Thousand Oaks communities with higher ratings and more stable leadership. Without such assurances, the perceived affordability remains a brittle advantage.
Ultimately, Gainsborough Oaks represents a pragmatic choice only for those willing to trade structural upkeep and governance stability for low cost and a personable touch. The most decisive factor is risk tolerance: families with limited margin for operational disruption or care uncertainty should pursue alternatives with stronger governance, better upkeep, and proven stability. For others prepared to accept ongoing cosmetic issues and potential staffing fluctuations as acceptable trade-offs, it can serve as a cautious, short-term option, provided a concrete exit plan is in place and ongoing diligence remains non-negotiable.
6 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Memory Care
Cats allowed
Dogs allowed
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Private
Private bathrooms
Respite or short term stays offered
Telephone
Wheelchair accessible showers
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Oxnard (19 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Incontinence care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Understanding Dementia Through Its Seven Stages: A Comprehensive Look at Progression and Expectations
A Holistic Dementia Care Guide: Effective Strategies for Memory Support
Comprehensive Insights into Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Their Assessment