2119 Monroe Street, Santa Clara, CA 95050
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Purglen Residential Care Home Costs & Pricing
Purglen Residential Care Home offers a remarkably competitive rate for private rooms at $1,700 per month, significantly lower than the average costs in Santa Clara County and across California. In comparison, the standard monthly fees in Santa Clara County hover around $4,096, while the state average is approximately $3,939. This substantial difference indicates that Purglen provides an attractive option for those seeking quality residential care without the financial burden often associated with similar facilities in both the county and state. The affordability of Purglen makes it an appealing choice for families looking for compassionate care that doesn't compromise on quality.
| Floor plans | Purglen Residential Care Home | Santa Clara County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private | $1,700 | $4,096 | $3,939 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Purglen Residential Care Home
Pros
The room is very nice, with a bath, natural light, and a comfy easy chair.
The staff are well regarded and the general facility is praised.
The location is great.
Cons
The reviewer found living there very stressful and frustrating.
The reviewer was emotionally abused by everyone, especially by the cook, and some tenants faced physical abuse.
It almost cost the reviewer their life to be there.
The reviewer would not recommend this place to anyone.
Sex is not allowed.
Review
Purglen Residential Care Home in Santa Clara is best suited for seniors who prize a comfortable, private living space with a clean, light-filled room and straightforward access to nearby amenities. The strongest positives center on the quality of personal accommodations, rooms with baths, ample natural light, and a comfortable chair that supports everyday living. In addition, the facility tends to be viewed favorably for its staff rapport and general upkeep, and the location is consistently cited as convenient. This combination makes it a practical choice for residents who want a pleasant, low-stress environment with reliable basic services, provided they do not require intensive medical oversight or highly structured supervision.
Families considering this community should explicitly weigh alternatives if safety and staff conduct are top priorities. A single, highly alarming review describes emotional and physical abuse by staff, including tenants’ mistreatment, with consequences severe enough to claim near-fatal risk. While this is one data point, it signals a potential red flag that cannot be dismissed. The contrast with the other reviews, where residents praise staff and space, means the experience can be profoundly inconsistent. Prospects with heightened sensitivity to resident safety, abuse prevention, and transparent incident handling will want to explore other options or demand rigorous assurances before committing.
The key pros, nice private rooms with baths, abundant natural light, and a comfortable private seating area, materially improve daily living. These features, paired with generally positive impressions of staff and the facility’s overall condition, translate into easier routines, smoother visits from family, and a more dignified living environment. For residents who value personal comfort and straightforward day-to-day operations, these strengths can make Purglen feel like a solid home base. The favorable location adds another practical layer, reducing transportation friction for appointments, social activities, and family visits.
Against those strengths, the most serious con is the safety concern raised in the negative review. Allegations of emotional and physical abuse by caregivers, and the claim that the situation nearly caused the resident’s death, are existential concerns that override even the appealing room features. Even if this account reflects a worst-case experience or a single mismanaged moment, it underscores the need for meticulous due diligence: licensing compliance, incident reporting, staff training, and a culture of resident protection must be verifiable and robust. The apparent discrepancy between positive staff impressions in other reviews and this accusation cannot be ignored.
How the positives offset the negatives depends on priorities and due diligence. For a family prioritizing comfort, independent living, and a convenient location, and willing to demand rigorous safeguards, Purglen can still be a viable option, provided that a transparent, updated safety plan accompanies the lease. However, for anyone whose primary concern is consistent, trustworthy care with strong oversight, this community warrants a thorough vetting process or a closer look at alternatives with proven safety records. The decision should hinge on concrete evidence: recent state inspections, incident logs, staff credentials, and clear, enforceable resident-rights protections.
The upshot is practical and direct: if safety, predictable supervision, and reliable abuse prevention matter most, proceed with extreme caution or look elsewhere. Begin with on-site inquiries during different shifts, request copies of licensing inspections, and insist on meeting current residents and staff to gauge how concerns are handled in practice. If choosing Purglen, insist on a formal safety plan, transparent reporting protocols, and a clear commitment to resident dignity and protection. For families that cannot accept the risk, or who require a consistently high standard of care, pursuing alternatives now will prevent a reactive scramble later and align more closely with a truly dependable, long-term care solution.















Comprehensive Insights into Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Their Assessment
Medicare Coverage for Assisted Living: An In-Depth Exploration
Choosing the Right Senior Care: A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living and Nursing Homes