Villa Fontana Costs & Pricing
Villa Fontana presents an upscale living experience with pricing that reflects its premium offerings in comparison to both Santa Clara County and the broader California market. For a studio, residents can expect to invest $5,690 monthly, which is notably higher than the county average of $5,155 and significantly exceeds the state average of $4,145. The one-bedroom option at Villa Fontana is priced at $6,890, again surpassing local ($5,861) and state ($4,340) benchmarks. The semi-private accommodations are priced at $7,490, a substantial leap above the county's rate of $3,943 and the state's average of $3,333. These figures highlight Villa Fontana's commitment to providing an elevated standard of living that is tailored for those seeking a distinguished lifestyle amidst competitive regional costs.
| Floor plans | Villa Fontana | Santa Clara County | California |
|---|
| Studio | $5,690 | $5,155 | $4,145 |
| 1 Bedroom | $6,890 | $5,861 | $4,340 |
| Semi-Private | $7,490 | $3,943 | $3,333 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$840 / mo
Alexandria Victoria
$4,850 / month
21.4 miles away
-
from -$490 / mo
The Mansion
$5,200 to $6,300 / month
18.9 miles away
-
from -$1045 / mo
Loma Clara Senior Living
$4,645 to $6,895 / month
23.1 miles away
-
from +$705 / mo
Almaden
$6,395 to $11,495 / month
6.5 miles away
-
from +$1030 / mo
Belmont Village Los Gatos
$6,720 to $13,590 / month
4.9 miles away
Overall Review of Villa Fontana
differentiator
3 reviews mention this
Care response and supervision
Residents describe fast, always-available help when they need assistance.
Several residents describe having an easy way to call for help from anywhere in the facility, and mention care that feels available around the clock. One reviewer specifically described needing 24/7 care while recovering, and another mentioned nurses checking vital signs on an hourly basis to reassure a loved one. The communityâs care offering also includes assistance with daily living and medication management.
common
14 reviews mention this
Staff is consistently described
The staff is consistently described as caring, communicative, and helpful.
Across reviews, residents and families describe staff and management as caring, friendly, and engaged with both residents and visitors. Multiple reviewers also call out communicationâwhether itâs keeping families informed or being accommodating during transitions. A number of comments connect the staff approach with a sense that the community is well run.
common
7 reviews mention this
Activities keep residents engaged
Residents and families report a steady mix of on-site activities.
Reviews describe regular activities that go beyond passive time, including things like karaoke, exercise, and games. Families also mention celebrations and themed gatherings, such as ice cream socials and holiday recognition. While some reviewers noted the pandemic temporarily limited activities, they still described activities as gradually opening back up.
common
6 reviews mention this
Dining meets most needs
Dining is a frequent point of feedback, with room for improvement.
Several reviews describe meals as good and convenient, including delivery to residents who donât come to the dining room. Others mention that meals are okay, with one example of a ham sandwich being harder for residents who chew slowly. The community also provides restaurant-style dining and room service, along with options for special diets described in the dining details.
differentiator
5 reviews mention this
Memory care feels separate
Memory care is described as set up differently than other areas of the community.
Reviewers who toured or placed loved ones in memory care describe a separate memory care unit with its own atmosphere. Others compare what they saw to their loved oneâs needs, including concerns about the level of assistance and the type of residents in the unit. At the same time, one reviewer said the setting seemed appropriate and that there were activities residents could take part in.
caveat
6 reviews mention this
Cost and older building come up
Reviews commonly flag both higher costs and an older facility feel.
Multiple families mention cost concerns, including a specific complaint about the monthly price and another comment that pricing add-ons can increase quickly. Reviews also describe the building as dated or older, with some noting a less updated feel or more closed-in rooms. One reviewer did note the community has been redone in parts, but overall the age of the facility remains a recurring point.
common
5 reviews mention this
Cleanliness stands out
The facility is repeatedly described as clean and well kept.
Several reviews praise cleanliness directly, including comments about the community staying on top of messes and maintaining a clean environment. Families also describe the rooms and common areas as clean, and one reviewer said the facility didnât smell. This cleanliness theme pairs with other positive comments about care and day-to-day upkeep.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.