1696 San Tomas Aquino Road, San Jose, CA 95130
To contact a resident: (408) 871-1755
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Evergreen Home Facilities Costs & Pricing
Evergreen Home Facilities offers competitive pricing for their residential services, particularly when compared to the broader market in Santa Clara County and across California. For a semi-private room, Evergreen's monthly rate stands at $2,000, significantly lower than the county average of $3,943 and even more favorable than the state average of $3,333. Similarly, their private rooms are priced at $3,000 per month, which not only undercuts the Santa Clara County's average of $4,096 but also offers a more appealing alternative to the statewide figure of $3,939. This strategic pricing positions Evergreen Home Facilities as an attractive option for individuals seeking quality care without compromising financial stability.
| Floor plans | Evergreen Home Facilities | Santa Clara County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $2,000 | $3,943 | $3,333 |
| Private | $3,000 | $4,096 | $3,939 |
Senior living communities with a similar price nearby
-
About the same
Sunny Orchard Place
$1,995 to $3,700 / month5.9 miles away -
from +$222 / mo
The Forum At Rancho San Antonio
$2,222 / month6.8 miles away -
About the same
Cogir of Fremont
$1,950 to $3,495 / month18.3 miles away -
from +$295 / mo
Westmont of Milpitas
$2,295 to $6,395 / month9.0 miles away -
from +$200 / mo
Zion Care Home I
$2,200 to $2,500 / month10.6 miles away
Overall Review of Evergreen Home Facilities
Cons
They thought these were apartments for people, but only cats lived there.- It was not a good match; parking was bad and the street was busy.
- It was not a good match; parking was bad and the street was busy.
- It was horrible; the caregiver never called the owner, the daughter, or 911 after the mother fell.
Review
Evergreen Home Facilities in San Jose is best suited for seniors who want extremely budget-conscious, apartment-style living with a pet-friendly environment, specifically for cat owners who are comfortable with a lean operation and limited staff oversight. It is not a fit for those who rely on consistent caregiving, dependable supervision, or timely, professional responses to emergencies. The community appears to attract residents who value independence over structured care, but the trade-off is a much higher demand on family members to monitor safety and communicate concerns.
Those weighing alternatives should consider families that require around‑the‑clock caregiving, robust safety monitoring, or reliable on-site staffing. If medical needs, mobility challenges, or cognitive issues exist, other options, licensed assisted living facilities or board-and-care homes with documented staff coverage and formal incident reporting, will typically deliver more predictable support. Parking convenience near a quiet, accessible entrance is also a legitimate concern for anyone balancing medical appointments or frequent visits, and Evergreen’s location on a busy street plus reported parking issues makes it less attractive for ongoing parent or grandparent care.
The few potential upsides that could justify an exploratory look, such as the possibility of affordable, independent living with a pet-friendly policy, do not meaningfully offset the most serious cons. The most damaging patterns in the reviews point to a lack of timely caregiver response, questionable accountability, and a troubling incident where a resident was injured and staff did not communicate the injury or escalate care promptly. When a caregiver’s neglect or delayed reporting is coupled with owner disputes over what happened, the fundamental safety risk becomes the dominant factor driving decision-making.
Before making any commitment, serious due diligence is essential. Prospective residents or their families should verify licensing status, staffing levels, and caregiver-to-resident ratios; seek a clear, written policy on incident reporting and emergency escalation; request to review any incident logs or family contact procedures; and tour the property during a shift to observe how staff interact with residents. Parking arrangements, security features, and the layout of the living spaces should be evaluated in person to assess fall risks and ease of supervision. Direct conversations with current residents or their families can expose the day-to-day realities that formal documents rarely capture.
If the conclusion points toward Evergreen as a potential option, approach it as a very specific, time-bound trial rather than a long-term solution. Set strict expectations for caregiver responsiveness, incident reporting, and owner accountability from day one, and secure a cancellation or transfer plan if those expectations are not met. For most families, however, the safer course is to compare Evergreen against licensed assisted living programs or well-reviewed board-and-care homes that demonstrate consistent staffing, proactive safety protocols, and reliable communication. In the current profile, Evergreen’s major safety concerns outweigh the limited financial appeal, making it a choice to consider only after rigorous vetting and only if alternative options fall outside budget or availability constraints.
Board and Care Home
Activities off-site
Devotional services off-site
Indoor common areas
Outdoor common areas
Private
Respite or short term stays offered
Wheelchair accessible showers
San Jose International (5 miles away)
Ambulatory care
High acuity care
Incontinence care
Kosher
Friendly, caring staff; clean, well-maintained facility with engaging activities and clear family communication.
Recognizing the Journey: Understanding and Navigating Anticipatory Grief
Encouraging Participation in Adult Day Care: A Guide to Supporting a Hesitant Parent
Comprehensive Exploration of Living Wills and Other Advance Directives