1129 Alameda Avenue, Glendale, CA 91201
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Alameda Board & Care
Pros
It is a nice, cool place to stay.- The staff is very professional and provides care, including administering the COVID-19 vaccine.
- It is a nice place for a rest home.
Cons
The facility is understaffed, with around 80 patients and fewer than 10 caregivers, leading to unprofessional care.- The staff are unprofessional and very rude to patients, showing they do not care.
- The place is not recommended and people should not bring their loved ones there.
- It is very sad to see how patients are treated there.
- The food is lousy and there are no activities due to COVID-19.
- There was a COVID-19 outbreak in March that resulted in resident deaths, making the situation frightening.
- A resident was repeatedly found with a busted face from being hit, with staff offering excuses, and belongings not returned.
Review
Alameda Board & Care in Glendale is best suited for families seeking a budget-conscious, basic board-and-care option where active oversight by relatives or a care manager is expected. The setting hosts a sizable resident population, with a low staff-to-resident ratio that implies daily care hinges on family involvement and outside monitoring. It may work for residents who are relatively mobile and require limited hands-on assistance, rather than those needing constant medical attention or skilled nursing. For households willing to roll up sleeves and demand transparent communication, this community can be workable. In short, this is an option for families prepared to close the care gap through vigilant oversight.
However, those who cannot tolerate safety concerns or inconsistent care should consider alternatives. Repeated accounts describe rude or unprofessional treatment, and some families report injuries with unclear explanations. Understaffing appears chronic: around 80 residents for fewer than 10 caregivers brackets the level of attention each resident receives. If a loved one requires constant supervision, rapid response to needs, or specialized memory or medical care, a higher-quality, better-staffed community will likely deliver safer service. And if meaningful daily activities and engaging dining experiences matter, this facility’s programming has demonstrable gaps that many families will deem unacceptable.
On the positive side, a subset of reviews credit staff with professionalism and genuine care, noting reasonable basic health standards in daily operations. A quiet, simple environment can be attractive for residents seeking minimal disruption and a predictable routine. Still, these positives are far from universal, and the most credible concerns center on inconsistent care, injuries with delayed explanations, and doubts about emergency responsiveness. The gap between a few favorable impressions and the breadth of negative experiences makes it hard to trust this community with someone who needs steady, proactive protection. The risk isn’t merely discomfort; it’s real safety risk when staffing is sparse and accountability is unclear.
Prospective families should push for specifics: request the current staff-to-resident ratio during peak hours and night shifts; review the activity schedule and dining options; obtain copies of recent incident reports and any licensing notices; and speak with several residents and their families about day-to-day care. Clarify how care plans are developed, updated, and communicated, and who monitors mobility, skin integrity, weight, and medication management. Inspect cleanliness, safety features, and whether residents have access to meaningful engagement. Finally, demand a clear grievance process and a tangible plan for remediation when expectations are not met.
For those constrained by price but unwilling to compromise safety or dignity, alternatives deserve serious consideration: other Glendale-area assisted living options with higher staffing, stronger programming, and firmer accountability; memory-care-focused communities for residents with cognitive impairment; or licensed skilled-nursing facilities when higher medical support is required. In-home care or home-health services can bridge gaps while preserving familiar surroundings, though they shift supervision to family or hired aides. The objective is to match care level with risk tolerance: if ongoing supervision cannot be guaranteed, a safer, more professionally run setting should be chosen.
Bottom line: Alameda Board & Care may serve as a lower-cost option for families prepared to provide active oversight and problem-solving. For most seniors needing reliable supervision, safety, and enriching daily life, alternatives with stronger staffing and clearer accountability will yield better outcomes. Schedule a candid visit, demand documentary evidence of staffing, safety practices, and governance, and decide only after weighing daily realities against cost. The decision should prioritize safety and dignity, with a concrete plan to escalate if care falls short.
6 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena (4 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Assisted Living Expenses and Long-Term Care Insurance: A Comprehensive Exploration
Securing Financial Support for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Overview
Social Security Benefits and Assisted Living: Navigating Options Across the U.S.