6924 Le Havre Way, Citrus Heights, CA 95621
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Phyllis' Care Home Costs & Pricing
Phyllis' Care Home offers competitive pricing for its residents, particularly when compared to both Sacramento County and broader California averages. For a semi-private room, the monthly cost is $2,200, significantly lower than Sacramento County's $3,106 and California's state average of $3,333. Similarly, the price for a private room at Phyllis' is set at $2,600 - again more affordable than the county's average of $3,686 and the state's $3,939. For those seeking studio accommodations, Phyllis' Care Home maintains an attractive rate of $2,600 as well, compared to Sacramento County's average of $3,865 and California's average of $4,145. These pricing advantages reflect Phyllis' commitment to providing quality care without compromising affordability for families in need.
| Floor plans | Phyllis' Care Home | Sacramento County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $2,200 | $3,106 | $3,333 |
| Studio | $2,600 | $3,865 | $4,145 |
| Private | $2,600 | $3,686 | $3,939 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Phyllis' Care Home
Pros
The caregivers treat residents as family.
The staff are very kind and do everything possible to keep residents happy and comfortable.
Residents eat together around the table, and the food is excellent.
This is a family-run business.
The home is described as wonderful.
Review
Phyllis' Care Home in Citrus Heights is best suited for families seeking an intimate, home-like living environment where seniors are treated as members of a close-knit family. The setting is small-scale and clearly family-run, a combination that often translates into a warm, personalized touch that larger facilities struggle to reproduce. Residents who value unhurried meals, regular social meals around a table, and staff who embody kindness and steady attentiveness will find this community a natural fit. The overarching impression from the experiences shared is not a clinical program but a lived sense of belonging, comfort, and consistent warmth delivered by people who view care as a family obligation.
That emphasis on family-style care naturally points to who may want to explore alternatives. For seniors with complex medical needs requiring robust, on-site nursing oversight, highly specialized therapies, or highly structured daily routines, a larger, more resource-rich community may be a better match. Families prioritizing expansive activity schedules, comprehensive medical management, or formal memory-care programs might find the scale and offerings of bigger facilities more reassuring. In short, if medical complexity or formal clinical services are non-negotiable, itâs prudent to compare options that provide those capabilities at a larger footprint.
The strongest pros are clear and directly aligned with the reviews: caregivers who look at residents as family, a consistently kind and purposeful staff, and a genuine effort to keep residents happy and comfortable. The communal dining, the whole team eating together, signals a culture of inclusion and daily companionship that can meaningfully reduce loneliness and foster real social connection. The fact that this is described as a family-run operation carries implications for continuity and trust; families reported âgoing above and beyondâ to ensure comfort, which translates into a sense of safety and reliability many seniors and their relatives crave.
What may be viewed as potential drawbacks, conversely, rests in the nature of a small, home-like setting. The reviews do not spell out concrete negatives, but common considerations for smaller, family-run homes include more limited access to highly specialized medical services, fewer on-site resources, and a gentler pace of offering activities that are less structured than those in larger communities. For some families, this can translate into a need for external coordination with doctors, therapists, and services, or a preference for a more formal program schedule. In scenarios where rapid medical escalation or intensive nurse-led supervision is essential, these gaps could become meaningful.
Yet the positives offset many of these potential gaps in a practical, meaningful way. The intimate, family-oriented culture tends to yield steadier caregiver relationships, lower turnover anxiety, and a reassuring sense of being known and understood. The social fabric, shared meals, staff who are readily available, and a daily climate of warmth, can buffer against the risk of isolation or logistical friction that sometimes attends larger communities. In summary, the strong relational core and high-quality meals described in the testimonials are powerful compensators for the absence of expansive medical services or formalized programming.
Ultimately, this community serves a specific decision trajectory well. It is a compelling choice for families prioritizing emotional well-being, personal attention, and a home-like ambiance over institutional polish. For those whose primary needs center on extensive clinical oversight, specialized memory care, or a wide array of on-site therapies, it is wise to pursue alternatives that provide those features more comprehensively. Phyllis' Care Home offers a practical, heartfelt option where residents are cherished, meals are thoughtfully prepared, and care feels personal enough to resemble living with family rather than residing in a facility. Make the call with a clear lens on medical needs versus emotional and social quality of life, and the choice will align with the core values driving the search.












When to Transition from Assisted Living to Memory Care: Key Indicators, Steps, and Finding the Right Community
Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained
How to Communicate with a Loved One Living with Dementia: 10 Supportive Strategies