13387 West Fargo Drive, Surprise, AZ 85374
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Golden Times
Pros
Golden Times is a wonderful facility with a compassionate and caring team.
Joy runs a tight ship and is trusted with residents' care.
The facility is family-run and it shows.
They treat people like family and not numbers.
The caregivers do a great job with everyone here.
The staff are nice and friendly.
They provide prompt help with health problems when needed.
The owners come in almost every day.
The home is nice and clean.
The meals are delicious.
Cons
The facility needs to be inspected and investigated because the level of care is not adequate for its residents.
The placement company and the patient coordinator falsely advertised the facility as capable of accepting patients with feeding tubes and tracheostomies.
The nurse who was supposed to oversee operations was not present.
Equipment and supplies were not properly verified, and staff had to be taught how to manage them.
Procedures were not appropriate, and equipment failures or malfunctions occurred daily.
The experience lasted 12 days with ongoing missing equipment and promises of staff that never arrived, implying neglect.
The sister-in-law’s care was neglected, including a malfunctioning feeding tube, vent issues, uninstalled equipment that leaked, and staff walking out.
Review
Golden Times is best suited for families seeking a warm, family-run home where daily caregiving feels intimate and personal. This community appeals to residents who value a house-like atmosphere, consistent presence from owners, and attentive, friendly staff who treat residents like family. It works well for individuals who can participate in meals and daily routines and who prioritize a sense of belonging and personal connection over clinical sophistication. In short, it is a practical fit for seniors who want comfort, predictable daily contact, and a homey vibe more than institutional rigor.
Those with advanced medical needs or requiring rigorous clinical oversight should seriously consider alternatives. Several reviews flag gaps in capability, including misrepresentations about what the home can safely manage (feeding tubes and tracheostomies) and a lack of consistent, on-site nursing supervision. Families facing complex requirements, ventilation, specialized equipment, or guaranteed daily nurse oversight, may find Golden Times insufficient. The risk, highlighted by reports of missed equipment and delayed responses, argues for a facility with stronger, verifiable clinical protocols and staffing plans.
On the plus side, two reviews laud Golden Times for a compassionate, well-run atmosphere. The claim that Joy “runs a tight ship” captures the essence of the home’s culture: a tightly knit, family-operated operation where caregivers are described as nice, friendly, and sincerely attentive. Residents benefit from a clean, well-kept environment and meals described as good to excellent. The owners’ regular presence is repeatedly cited as a strength, signaling consistent, hands-on management and a sense of accountability that can matter deeply for families seeking reassurance.
The most damaging notes revolve around safety and reliability gaps. Families recount equipment failures or inadequate setup for critical needs, with claims of daily “disaster” scenarios and even neglect-like situations within a short stay. Reports describe missing or delayed nursing oversight, unfulfilled promises of routine nurse visits, and staff turnover that undermines continuity of care. One account details a 12-day stay punctuated by missing equipment and a lack of trained personnel, while another describes a patient with feeding tube and vent receiving insufficient care and a chilling, unsafe environment. Such experiences, even if isolated, are material red flags for anyone evaluating long-term placement.
How the positives stack up against the negatives will depend on priorities. If the priority is a homey, person-centered environment with clearly engaged ownership, the strengths can offset minor service gaps for residents who need companionship, daily assistance, and consistent day-to-day warmth. But the most serious concerns, inadequate medical capability, unsafe equipment handling, and inconsistent clinical oversight, cannot be dismissed. They shift the calculus toward caution for residents with significant medical needs or for families who cannot tolerate inconsistent monitoring. The decision hinges on balancing the value of a comforting, family-run setting against the imperative of reliable, capable clinical care.
For families seriously considering Golden Times, the prudent course is thorough due diligence. Visit with a clear checklist: request to meet the care director and the owners, observe a routine day, and verify the exact medical capabilities the home can safely provide. Confirm staffing ratios, on-site RN or LPN availability, and a formal process for emergencies. Obtain the exact care plan for the resident’s needs, including equipment, feeds, and monitoring. Ask for recent references from both satisfied and dissatisfied families, and insist on a written policy outlining what happens if equipment fails or if nurse coverage is delayed. If those assurances cannot be delivered, or if the resident’s needs extend beyond the home’s proven capabilities, pursue alternatives with stronger clinical infrastructure and documented safety record.







Vibrant Senior Living: A Comprehensive Guide for Active Older Adults
When to Transition from Assisted Living to Memory Care: Key Indicators, Steps, and Finding the Right Community
Assisted Living and Memory Care: Understanding Their Core Differences